Copy Image Button (Invisible Helper)

Back

Share

Share

DeFi

Oct 7, 2025

11 min read

Bullet: The Network Extension That Turns Solana Into an Onchain Nasdaq

Bullet: The Network Extension That Turns Solana Into an Onchain Nasdaq

Introduction: The Solana Thesis & The Need for Specialized Trading Infrastructure

The digital asset landscape is in a constant state of rapid evolution, currently witnessing a Cambrian explosion of innovation where blockchains compete on scalability, security, and decentralization. This relentless evolution is driven by a simple, powerful vision: the creation of "Internet Capital Markets." Becoming a truly global, digital, permissionless, 24/7 financial system that is not subject to the artificial constraints of traditional finance, more efficient, more transparent and accessible, is also the endgame vision of DeFi.

In this arena, @solana has unequivocally carved out its niche as a titan of speed and throughput. Its evolution from a promising but embattled L1 to a vibrant hub for trading, token launches, and liquidity is one of the defining narratives of recent crypto cycles.

With Total Value Locked (TVL) steadily climbing (currently standing at $12B, representing > 2x increase YoY) and onchain DEX volumes (consistently topping $5B in daily volume) frequently eclipsing those of its competitors, Solana has become the de facto venue for retail liquidity. The meteoric rise of platforms like @pumpdotfun and @bonk_fun, which have democratized token creation and trading, serves as a testament to the network's raw power and appeal.

However, this very success has illuminated the network's growing pains and the inherent limitations of its architecture for a specific, yet crucial, user base: professional and high-frequency traders. The Solana thesis has always been about speed, but speed within a general-purpose environment is not the same as the specialized, low-latency performance required for a professional-grade derivatives exchange.

While the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) is a marvel of parallel processing, it is still a shared resource. During periods of high volatility or popular NFT mints, the network becomes congested, fee markets become unpredictable, and transaction inclusion is never guaranteed. For a market maker quoting tight spreads or a trader needing to exit a position instantly, this unreliability is untenable. The endgame vision of DeFi, creating financial markets that are open, transparent, and unstoppable, cannot be fully realized if its infrastructure buckles under pressure.

This is precisely the gap that @bulletxyz_ aims to fill. It is not merely another perpetual DEX on Solana; it is a fundamental re-imagining of what onchain trading can be. Bullet is Solana's answer to @HyperliquidX, the breakout derivatives platform that demonstrated the market's immense appetite for CEX-level performance in a decentralized package. But its ambition extends far beyond that.

By leveraging the concept of network extensions, a.k.a. application-specific/opinionated execution layers that use a base chain for security and settlement while handling execution in a bespoke environment, Bullet marks a crucial evolutionary step for the Solana DeFi industry. It is the blueprint for building an onchain Nasdaq: a trading venue with the performance of traditional finance, the transparency of the blockchain, and the composability of DeFi, built on the liquidity-rich shores of the Solana ecosystem.

  1. The Solana Landscape & The Path to a Solana-based Nasdaq

To fully appreciate the innovation that Bullet brings, one must first understand the specific constraints of building high-performance trading infrastructure on a general-purpose blockchain like Solana. While Solana's 400ms block times are revolutionary compared to Ethereum's, they are an eternity in the world of high-frequency trading, where price discovery on centralized exchanges like Binance occurs at latencies below 20ms. This fundamental limitation relegates most onchain venues to a secondary role, engaging in CEX-DEX arbitrage rather than serving as the primary source of price discovery.

Fig 2. Solana Landscape

This architectural reality has capped the growth of existing Solana-based perpetuals DEXs. Platforms like @JupiterExchange Perps, while functional and popular for the retail segment, are built on an Automated Market Maker (AMM) model.

AMMs, though innovative for bootstrapping liquidity in a decentralized manner, are fraught with issues for professional traders. They are inherently capital-inefficient, suffer from high slippage on larger trades, and expose liquidity providers to the significant risk of impermanent loss. This model is simply not conducive to the tight spreads and deep, granular order books that define modern financial markets.

Other platforms like @DriftProtocol have adopted a hybrid model, incorporating elements of a central limit order book (CLOB), but they are still fundamentally constrained by the L1, facing a litany of challenges that create an insurmountable performance gap with centralized venues:

  • Congestion: During high market volatility, precisely when traders need reliability the most, a vicious negative feedback loop emerges. Bots flood the network to capture arbitrage and liquidation opportunities, driving up priority fees and clogging blockspace. This congestion makes it harder for regular users, market makers, and even the exchange operator to manage risk or close trades. This, in turn, leads to more liquidations and even more network congestion. For a trading venue, where 99.9%+ reliability is the gold standard, this is a critical, systemic flaw.

  • Unpredictable Fee Markets: Solana's priority fee market, while an improvement over a simple first-in-first-out system, remains highly unpredictable. Market makers, who must update their quotes thousands of times per day to reflect the latest market conditions, struggle to determine the correct fee to bid for transaction inclusion. This forces them into a difficult choice: either risk their orders not landing by underbidding, or constantly overpay just to avoid getting sniped. This creates an unfavorable and high-cost environment that erodes market maker profitability and ultimately results in wider spreads for all traders.

  • High Operational Costs: On a general-purpose L1, every state change costs gas. Traders are forced to pay a fee for every limit order they place, modify, or cancel, regardless of whether it gets filled. This creates significant operational friction and a high cost structure that disincentivizes active market participation and sophisticated trading strategies.

  • User Experience Hurdles: The standard DeFi experience, downloading a browser extension, meticulously managing a seed phrase, and manually signing every single transaction, is a major barrier to entry for a non-crypto-native audience. For power users, it's a point of extreme friction, where a single delayed wallet pop-up can mean missing a critical trade worth thousands.

Collectively, these challenges create an environment that is fundamentally hostile to professional capital and sophisticated participants. The inability to guarantee execution, the unpredictable costs, and the constant friction mean that market quality suffers. Spreads remain wider than on centralized venues, order book depth is thinner, and true price discovery is stifled. It relegates onchain trading to a slower, less efficient alternative, rather than the superior financial layer it is meant to be.

This is where the concept of network extensions could be transformative. A network extension, or (as mentioned before) application-specific execution layer that extends the base layer’s functionality, is not a sidechain with its own validator set, nor is it a conventional L2 that simply inherits security. It's a sovereign execution environment tailored for a specific purpose, in Bullet's case, trading. It offloads the heavy computational load of order matching and execution from the congested main street of the Solana L1 to its own dedicated superhighway. This allows for millisecond-level transaction processing and real-time order book updates.

Crucially, however, it does not sacrifice the core benefits of building on Solana. It remains deeply integrated with the decentralized base layer, using Solana for settlement, the final, irreversible recording of trades and balances. This hybrid approach provides the best of both worlds:

  • Leveraging the Solana Base Layer: Bullet retains access to Solana's deep, composable liquidity and its massive, engaged user base. Users can deposit assets from the L1 to Bullet almost instantly and interact with Bullet using their existing Solana wallets, making it feel like a seamless extension of the ecosystem, not an isolated island.

  • Dedicated Blockspace: By having its own blockspace, Bullet is immune to Solana's network-wide congestion. During a market crash or a memecoin frenzy, Bullet's trading environment remains stable and performant, providing the reliability that professional capital demands.

  • Customizable Logic: The extension can implement its own rules, such as application-specific sequencing, to create a fairer and more efficient market structure, something impossible in a general-purpose VM where all applications must abide by the same rigid rules.

For Solana to mature from a retail-centric chain into a hub for institutional-grade finance, this evolution is not just beneficial, it is absolutely necessary. The ecosystem needs a venue that can offer CEX-style UX and performance without compromising on the DeFi principles of self-custody and verifiability. Bullet changes the dynamic, and the next section will explore the technical architecture that makes this paradigm shift possible.

  1. Deep Dive Into Bullet’s Technical Architecture

Bullet is not just yet another incremental improvement to Solana’s DeFi infrastructure. It is a leap forward built on a stack that consists of pioneering technologies that have only recently reached maturity. It is a pioneering implementation of the @sovereign_labs SDK, combining a modular architecture with zero-knowledge cryptography to create a verifiable, high-performance trading engine.

Fig 3. Bullet's High Level Architecture

At its heart is Bullet Core, a purely Rust-based execution environment. This is the equivalent of Hyperliquid's HyperCore, a custom-built runtime free from the constraints of a general-purpose virtual machine like the SVM or EVM. Without strict limits on compute units, stack sizes, or transactions per block, Bullet's developers can design complex financial primitives, like a cross-margin engine supporting hundreds of markets, without compromise. The entire logic of the exchange, the matching engine, the risk systems, the lending markets, is executed natively, unlocking unparalleled performance.

This architecture rests on four key pillars, a modular design that delegates specific tasks to specialized layers for maximum efficiency:

  1. Execution (Bullet Core): As described, this is where the magic happens. A Rust-based execution environment built with the before-mentioned Sovereign SDK, running on a centralized sequencer architecture where the latter orders and executes transactions in real-time, providing users with soft confirmations within 1 millisecond. This is what creates the CEX-like feeling (or even faster) of instantaneous trading. The sequencer operates a streaming model, processing transactions as they arrive, rather than batching them into discrete blocks like a traditional blockchain.

  2. Settlement (Solana): After execution, the sequencer batches transactions and settles them on the Solana L1. This is the anchor of trust. By using Solana for final settlement, Bullet inherits the security and decentralization of Solana's vast validator network. Users' funds are ultimately secured by the L1, providing a trust-minimized foundation.

  3. Data Availability (@celestia): A critical component of any rollup is ensuring that all transaction data is made publicly available, so that anyone can independently verify the state of the chain. Posting this data to a monolithic L1 like Solana or Ethereum can be prohibitively expensive. Bullet sidesteps this by leveraging Celestia, a specialized data availability network. Celestia provides a cheap, scalable, and secure place to dump transaction data to (with a data throughput of up to 27 MB/s), drastically reducing the operational costs of the rollup.

  4. ZK Proving & Verification (@SuccinctLabs SP1 zkVM): This is the cryptographic glue that holds the system together and ensures its integrity. How can we trust that the centralized sequencer is executing transactions correctly? The answer is zero-knowledge proofs. Bullet uses a cutting-edge RISC-V powered zkVM from Succinct Labs called SP1. The breakthrough of a general-purpose zkVM like SP1 is that it can prove the execution of standard, native Rust code without the massive overhead of traditional interpreters. Benchmarks show the SVM has a significantly higher cycle count overhead compared to native Rust. SP1 brings this down dramatically, making ZK proofs for complex applications economically feasible for the first time, with proving costs falling to fractions of a cent per transaction. The entire Bullet Core runtime is cross-compiled into a ZK circuit. A network of provers then generates a succinct, cryptographic proof (a ZK-SNARK) attesting to the validity of every state transition, which is then posted and efficiently verified on Solana via corresponding verifier contracts.

The complete flow is an elegant dance of modular components:

Execution -> Data Dumping onto Celestia -> ZK Proving of Execution -> Proof Verification on Solana.

Fig 4.  Bullet's Stack Visualization

This unique design enables several key innovations. One of the most significant is application-specific sequencing. In a general-purpose blockchain, transactions are typically ordered by gas fees, leading to a brutal, latency-driven game of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) where market makers are often front-run by arbitrage bots. Bullet's sequencer, on the other hand, can enforce predefined ordering rules. For example, it prioritizes maker orders and cancellations over taker orders. This simple rule change creates a much more sustainable market microstructure, protecting liquidity providers from adverse selection and encouraging deeper, tighter spreads.

Fig 5. Instant & Reliable Trade Execution

Furthermore, Bullet's architecture is built with a bigger picture in mind. Its oracle integration with Pyth Lazer provides millisecond-latency price feeds directly from major exchanges, essential for a high-frequency trading environment. Its state database is moving towards NOMT (Nearly Optimal Merkle Tree), a cutting-edge design capable of sustaining over 40,000 TPS, ensuring that state management will never be the bottleneck. This is a system designed not just to compete with today's DEXs, nor CEXs, but to rival the infrastructure of the Nasdaq.

Fig 6. Benchmark Performance Comparison

The Product: CEX-Grade Onchain Trading

World-class technology is meaningless if it doesn't translate into a world-class product. Bullet's sophisticated architecture is purpose-built to deliver a trading experience that is not just better than other DEXs, but is competitive with the best centralized exchanges. The platform offers the trifecta of core DeFi primitives under one roof, creating a capital-efficient, unified financial hub.

  • Perpetual Futures: This is the flagship product, designed for active traders. It offers high leverage (up to 100x), deep liquidity across over 100 markets, and a sophisticated cross-margin system. Unlike isolated margin, where collateral is tied to a single position, cross-margin allows users to utilize a single pool of collateral across all their positions. This dramatically increases capital efficiency and reduces the risk of liquidation on a single volatile position. Furthermore, the system supports multi-collateral, meaning users can deposit most major assets (not just USDC) and use them as margin without having to sell them first. To keep perpetual prices anchored to their underlying spot markets, a funding rate is applied hourly. This is calculated based on a fixed interest rate (I) of 0.00125% per hour and a Premium Index (P) that measures the deviation between the impact bid/ask prices on the order book and the oracle's index price, ensuring fair and stable convergence.

Fig 7. How Funding Rates Work
  • Spot Trading: For investors and traders who want to own the underlying crypto assets directly, Bullet provides a high-performance spot market. This allows for seamless arbitrage between spot and derivatives and makes Bullet a one-stop shop for all trading activities, with margin trading planned for the future.

  • Borrow/Lending Engine: An integrated money market that allows users to earn passive income on their idle assets or unlock liquidity by borrowing against their holdings. The interest rates are not arbitrary; they are governed by a sophisticated algorithmic model designed to maintain market equilibrium. The model uses a piecewise function based on the asset's utilization rate (u). When utilization is below an optimal threshold (u_opt), borrowing costs rise gradually and predictably. However, as utilization surpasses this optimal point, the interest rate curve steepens sharply. This mechanism acts as an automatic economic incentive: when an asset becomes heavily borrowed, the high interest rates paid to lenders attract new deposits, thereby rebalancing the pool and ensuring liquidity remains available for borrowers. This dynamic, self-correcting system is crucial for the platform's stability and creates a powerful flywheel, as collateral deposited for trading can simultaneously earn yield, further enhancing capital efficiency.

The platform also features a full suite of professional-grade order types, including Limit (GTC), Fill or Kill (FOK), Immediate or Cancel (IOC), and various Post-Only options designed for market makers, such as Post-Only Slide (places the order one tick away from the opposing best price if crossing) and Post-Only Front (places the order one tick ahead of the same-side best price). This is complemented by conditional orders like Take Profit and Stop Loss.

Fig 8. Bullet's User Interface

At the core of the product stands a robust, multi-layered risk management engine:

  • Initial Margin Breach: If an account's margin balance drops below the initial requirement, all open orders that would increase risk are automatically cancelled.

  • Maintenance Margin Breach: If the balance falls further, below the maintenance margin level, the account is flagged for liquidation. All remaining orders are cancelled, and the system begins to sell off open positions as market orders on the exchange's order book.

  • Backstop Liquidations: If the position is too large or the market is moving too fast for the order book to absorb the liquidation, a Community Liquidation Vault steps in. This vault, which is open to the community, takes over the position at its bankruptcy price, earning a reward for helping to secure the system.

  • Insurance Fund & ADL: As final lines of defense against black swan events, an Insurance Fund, denominated in USDC, covers any remaining losses to prevent bad debt from accruing. If this fund is ever depleted (an extremely rare event), an Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) system is triggered. This system automatically reduces the positions of the most profitable traders with the highest leverage, ensuring the system remains solvent without socializing losses across all users.

This powerful product suite is wrapped in a user experience designed to eliminate the traditional friction points of DeFi. Through an integration with @hyperlane, Bullet supports bridging from all major chains. And with @RelayProtocol, it will enable near-instant, intents-based bridging that takes mere seconds. The performance specifications speak for themselves: 1 millisecond soft confirmations, a capacity of over 8,000 exchange orders per second, and hard finality on Solana in 5-12 seconds. This is all made accessible through wallet abstraction (social logins via Privy, session keys) and gas abstraction (a paymaster to sponsor fees), finally delivering on the promise of a CEX-grade experience onchain. This seamless experience extends to the existing Solana community, offering full, native compatibility with all major Solana wallets, including @phantom, @solflare, and @Backpack.

Fig 9. Latency Comparison.  Note on latency comparison: Bullet's 1ms measures soft confirmations from the sequencer within its specialized CLOB architecture, while Solana's 400ms represents general-purpose blockchain block time. Solana shreds (~20-50ms) enable faster data propagation for certain use cases, though final ordering for both systems requires additional confirmations. Ultimately each architecture optimizes for different trade-offs.

Another key innovation is the flexibility of account management: a single Bullet trading account can be tied to multiple wallets and login methods. This allows a user to manage their account from a laptop using a browser extension and then access the very same account on their phone via a mobile wallet, providing unparalleled convenience. Crucially, Bullet's vision for accessibility extends beyond a single ecosystem. Compatibility will not be limited to the above-mentioned Solana wallets. Users will also be able to sign up and connect with popular EVM wallets like @MetaMask or @Rabby_io, breaking down walled gardens and welcoming liquidity and users from across the entire crypto landscape.

  1. Competitive Analysis & Future Vision

Bullet is not entering a vacuum. The race to build the dominant onchain derivatives venue is one of the most competitive in crypto. However, especially amid an increasing flow of tokenized RWAs coming onchain, the “cake” is likely big enough for more than one major player. Additionally, Bullet's novel architecture provides a distinct and powerful edge, particularly within the Solana ecosystem, by learning from its predecessors and leveraging a new generation of infrastructure components to build a best-in-class system.

Its most direct competitor in terms of ambition and performance is probably Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid brilliantly proved the market's demand for the model: a performant, application-specific L1 with native CLOB infrastructure can attract immense volume if the UX is “good enough” to rival CEXes, and liquidity can be mobilized to create network effects around the platform. Bullet learns from this success and takes it a step further by building its exchange out as a network extension on Solana, creating a crucial strategic difference.

Hyperliquid, by building its own L1, operates as a siloed "island." While performant (up to 200k orders per second and median latency of 200ms), it relies on a small, permissioned validator set (21 nodes), creating a rather significant centralization trade-off. It also must bootstrap its entire ecosystem and liquidity from scratch.

Bullet, in contrast, is a high-performance metropolis connected by a superhighway to the Solana continent. It inherits the security and decentralization of Solana's 1,000+ validator network and can directly tap into its pre-existing, multi-billion dollar liquidity base and massive user community. The recent integration of Hyperliquid into the Phantom wallet (a Solana-native wallet) is a clear signal of where the demand lies. Bullet is positioned to natively serve this demand from day one. This distinction in security and decentralization is not merely academic. It has profound implications for the platform's long-term viability and appeal to institutional players.

By anchoring its security in Solana's globally distributed and battle-tested validator set, Bullet offers a level of trustlessness that a permissioned validator set cannot match. For institutions, large traders, and protocols looking to build on top of a financial primitive, this difference can be a critical decision-making factor. It shifts the trust assumption from a small, named group of entities to a credibly neutral and censorship-resistant base layer, representing a fundamentally more robust foundation for an "onchain Nasdaq."

Fig 10. Bullet's Comparison Table

Compared to existing Solana perp DEXs, the difference is night and day. Jupiter Perps, with its AMM model, and Drift, with its hybrid model, are fundamentally limited by the L1. A direct comparison highlights Bullet's technical superiority across every key metric:

  • Model: CLOB vs. AMM/Hybrid. The CLOB is historically proven to be the most efficient mechanism for price discovery, enabling tighter spreads and deeper, more transparent liquidity.

  • Latency: 1ms soft confirmation vs. 400ms+ on the L1. This is a 400x improvement, moving from a noticeable delay to real-time execution.

  • Congestion: Dedicated L2 blockspace vs. susceptibility to L1 congestion. Bullet offers reliability when it's needed most, while L1 DEXs can become unusable during peak volatility.

  • Oracle Prices: Updates down to 1ms via Pyth Lazer vs. 400ms on the L1. This prevents stale pricing and protects against oracle manipulation.

  • Security: An optimistic rollup secured by ZK-fraud proofs and Solana's validator set vs. a single L1 smart contract. Bullet's modular security model is arguably more robust.

  • User Experience: One-click trading vs. manual signing for every transaction. The UX gap is immense and is critical for attracting and retaining power users.

The true novelty of Bullet's architecture lies in its masterful synthesis of technologies that simply didn't exist a few years ago. The Sovereign SDK, Celestia for DA, general-purpose zkVMs like SP1, and real-time oracles like Pyth Lazer are all at the bleeding edge. By integrating them into a cohesive system, Bullet has built a platform that is future-proof and fundamentally more capable than its predecessors, creating a significant technical moat.

The vision extends far beyond simply capturing the existing DeFi market. The goal is to build infrastructure that is robust and performant enough to attract volume from centralized exchanges and even traditional finance. The "onchain Nasdaq" is not just a marketing slogan; it's the end game. A key part of this roadmap is the future introduction of the BulletSVM. Analogous to Hyperliquid's HyperEVM, this will allow other developers to permissionlessly deploy Solana smart contracts on top of Bullet's execution layer.

This means other protocols, structured products, yield strategies, socialfi apps, or even other specialized exchanges, could be built on top of Bullet, leveraging its core matching engine, liquidity, and speed via pre-compiles. This will transform Bullet from a single product into a true financial ecosystem, a dedicated, composable trading layer for the entire Solana network and beyond.

Conclusion

The evolution of decentralized finance is a story of overcoming limitations. From the slow and expensive early days of Ethereum to the high-throughput era pioneered by Solana, each step forward has unlocked new possibilities. Bullet represents the next logical step in this journey as it proves that the trade-offs between speed, cost, and decentralization are not immutable laws, but engineering challenges waiting to be solved. By moving execution to a dedicated, high-performance layer while anchoring security and settlement to Solana's decentralized base, Bullet resolves the core constraints that have held back onchain trading.

With a novel, modular architecture and harnessing the power of novel infra components including the Sovereign SDK, Celestia's high-throughput data availability layer, and Succinct's ZK proving network, Bullet delivers a system that is verifiably correct and remains non-custodial without compromising on CEX-grade performance. 1ms soft confirmations, a full suite of integrated DeFi primitives, and a seamless user experience are not future promises, with Bullet they might just be the new standard.

As Solana's definitive answer to Hyperliquid, Bullet is poised to become the gravitational center for liquidity and trading activity within the ecosystem. But its vision is even bigger: to provide the foundational infrastructure for an onchain Nasdaq, a venue where both crypto-native assets and tokenized assets can trade with unparalleled efficiency and transparency.

The journey is just beginning with Bullet currently live on testnet, giving users a chance to experience the future of onchain trading firsthand, while the team is preparing for mainnet launch. The opportunity to get involved is now.

Take the Next Step

  • Join the Waitlist: Sign up to get early access to the gated mainnet launch here.

  • Try the Testnet: Experience the speed and performance of Bullet for yourself at app.bullet.xyz.

The future of finance is being built today. It is fast, it is verifiable, and it is onchain. It is Bullet.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. Digital assets are highly volatile and involve substantial risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with qualified financial advisors before making any investment decisions. A1 Research is not responsible for any losses incurred based on the information provided in this article. This campaign contains sponsored content. A1 Research and its affiliates may hold positions in the projects and protocols mentioned in this article.


Recommended Articles

Dive into 'Narratives' that will be important in the next year

A1 Research - Shaping crypto’s

most compelling stories.

The content published by A1 Research is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute investment advice, financial guidance, or an offer to buy or sell any securities, digital assets, or financial products. All opinions and analyses expressed are those of the individual authors or the A1 Research team, and do not represent the views of any affiliated entities unless explicitly stated.

While A1 Research may collaborate with industry participants, protocols, or investors, we maintain full editorial independence. In some cases, these relationships may influence the areas we choose to explore, but never the integrity of our research or conclusions. Any such relationships will be disclosed where relevant.

Nothing on this website or in associated content, including newsletters, reports, or social media. should be relied upon for investment decisions. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional advisers before acting on any information found in our materials.

All rights reserved. A1 Research 2025 ©

A1 Research - Shaping crypto’s

most compelling stories.

The content published by A1 Research is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute investment advice, financial guidance, or an offer to buy or sell any securities, digital assets, or financial products. All opinions and analyses expressed are those of the individual authors or the A1 Research team, and do not represent the views of any affiliated entities unless explicitly stated.

While A1 Research may collaborate with industry participants, protocols, or investors, we maintain full editorial independence. In some cases, these relationships may influence the areas we choose to explore, but never the integrity of our research or conclusions. Any such relationships will be disclosed where relevant.

Nothing on this website or in associated content, including newsletters, reports, or social media. should be relied upon for investment decisions. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional advisers before acting on any information found in our materials.

All rights reserved. A1 Research 2025 ©

A1 Research - Shaping crypto’s

most compelling stories.

The content published by A1 Research is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute investment advice, financial guidance, or an offer to buy or sell any securities, digital assets, or financial products. All opinions and analyses expressed are those of the individual authors or the A1 Research team, and do not represent the views of any affiliated entities unless explicitly stated.

While A1 Research may collaborate with industry participants, protocols, or investors, we maintain full editorial independence. In some cases, these relationships may influence the areas we choose to explore, but never the integrity of our research or conclusions. Any such relationships will be disclosed where relevant.

Nothing on this website or in associated content, including newsletters, reports, or social media. should be relied upon for investment decisions. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional advisers before acting on any information found in our materials.

All rights reserved. A1 Research 2025 ©